Petrobras non-prosecution agreement and SEC settlement (2018)
- Agencies
- DOJ Criminal Division Fraud Section, U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, FBI and SEC 1,2 3
- Penalty split
- US$85,320,000 to DOJ, US$85,320,000 credited to the SEC, US$682,560,000 credited to Brazil 1,2
- SEC amounts
- Disgorgement and prejudgment interest of US$933,473,797, reduced by payments to the US class action fund 1. Civil penalty of US$853 million, offset by Brazilian penalties 3
- Statute
- FCPA books and records and internal controls provisions, 15 U.S.C. 78m 2
- Admission
- Petrobras "admits, accepts, and acknowledges that it is responsible under United States law" for the conduct in the statement of facts 2
- Cooperation credit
- 25% off the bottom of the Sentencing Guidelines fine range. No voluntary disclosure 1,2
- Term
- Three years, extendable by up to one year 2
- Monitor
- None. Self-reporting to DOJ 2
The non-prosecution agreement
The agreement is a letter from the DOJ Fraud Section and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, dated 26 September 2018 2. It was signed for Petrobras by its general counsel and its outside counsel 2. DOJ announced it on 27 September 2018 1.
DOJ resolved the case by a non-prosecution agreement, and no criminal charge against Petrobras is described in the release or the agreement 1,2. The company "admits, accepts, and acknowledges that it is responsible under United States law" for the acts of its officers, directors, employees and agents described in the statement of facts 2. It agreed that the facts "constitute a violation of law," naming the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 2.
The conduct described
DOJ said Petrobras admitted that it "failed to make and keep books, records and accounts that accurately and fairly reflected" its capitalisation of property, plant and equipment 1. DOJ said certain executives "signed false Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) 302 sub-certifications" 1. The statement of facts says Petrobras "violated all of the elements of the books and records and internal controls provisions" 2.
Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski said "Executives at the highest levels of Petrobras" facilitated bribes to Brazilian politicians and political parties and "cooked the books" 1.
The SEC said it estimated an overstatement of assets of about US$2.5 billion 3. It referred to a US$10 billion stock offering to US investors in 2010 3. SEC Co-Director of Enforcement Steven Peikin said "If an international company sells securities in the United States, it must provide truthful information" 3.
Money: the penalty and the split
The agreement sets a total criminal penalty of US$853,200,000 2. DOJ said this reflects a 25% discount off the low end of the Sentencing Guidelines fine range for "full cooperation and remediation" 1. Petrobras did not voluntarily disclose the conduct 1.
The SEC settlement
The SEC announced a settlement on 27 September 2018 under SEC order 33-10561 3. It required US$933 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest and an US$853 million civil penalty 3. DOJ gave the disgorgement and interest figure as US$933,473,797 1. The disgorgement is offset by certain payments to investors under the class action In re Petrobras Securities Litigation in the Southern District of New York 1,3. The penalty is offset by penalties paid to Brazilian authorities 3.
The SEC release does not state whether Petrobras admitted or denied the SEC's findings 3. The SEC order was not reviewed for this page.
Status
The agreement runs for three years from execution and may be extended by up to one year 2. No independent monitor was required 2. Petrobras agreed to file an initial compliance report within one year and two follow-up reviews, the second at least 30 days before the term ends 2. The agreement says the reports are intended to remain non-public 2. No DOJ document confirming the end of the term was reached, so this page does not report it.
Common questions
Was Petrobras charged with a crime in the US?
No. DOJ resolved the case through a non-prosecution agreement 1,2.
Did Petrobras admit wrongdoing?
Yes. In the NPA it accepted responsibility for the conduct in the statement of facts and agreed the facts violate the FCPA 2.
How much did Petrobras pay?
The criminal penalty was US$853.2 million, 80% of it credited to Brazil 1. The SEC terms add US$933 million in disgorgement and interest, offset by class action payments 3.
Rules and fees change. Check the official site linked above before you apply or pay. Spotted an error? Email hello@settlementsexplained.org with the official link.
Sources
- U.S. Department of Justice: Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras Agrees to Pay More Than $850 Million for FCPA Violations, press release 18-1258 (27 September 2018)
- U.S. Department of Justice: Petrobras non-prosecution agreement and statement of facts (26 September 2018)
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission: Petrobras Reaches Settlement With SEC for Misleading Investors, press release 2018-215 (27 September 2018)
Related
- Deferred and non-prosecution agreements explained
How U.S. deferred prosecution agreements and non-prosecution agreements work for companies, the Justice Manual factors, and what the company admits.
- FCPA resolutions explained
How U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act cases end: declinations, NPAs, DPAs, guilty pleas and SEC actions, with the statute, penalties and DOJ policy.
- Odebrecht and Braskem guilty pleas and settlements (2016)
In December 2016 Odebrecht and Braskem pleaded guilty to FCPA conspiracy in New York. Amounts, charges, admissions and terms from DOJ and SEC records.
- SEC settlements: neither admit nor deny
What an SEC settlement without admissions means, the 1972 no-deny policy in 17 CFR 202.5(e), and its rescission by the SEC on 18 May 2026.